home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- LETTERS, Page 8Money for Art
-
- In reply to Robert Hughes' piece supporting public funding
- for controversial art (ESSAY, Aug. 14): yes, pharaohs, kings and
- Popes endowed great art, but for their own glory and to suit
- their own taste. U.S. artists trample on the values of the
- Neanderthals and make them pay for it.
-
- Christopher S. Johnson Webster Groves, Mo.
-
- As a backer of the arts, I am concerned about Senator Jesse
- Helms' attack on the National Endowment for the Arts. I hope
- his amendment forbidding the NEA to underwrite provocative
- projects is defeated. Arts funding is hard to obtain, and we do
- not need this Neanderthal's prehistoric ideas on artistic
- freedom.
-
- Jane Jenkins Hickory, N.C.
-
- I hate to admit it, but there is a valid point in Helms'
- "paleo-conservative" rhetoric that we in the arts must heed.
- While much of Robert Mapplethorpe's work is art, some of it is,
- in my opinion, highly polished pornography, and people are
- entitled to be outraged on seeing it displayed under the aegis
- of the NEA. The art community must be willing to admit that not
- everything that calls itself art merits public funding, or we
- will be handing Helms the ammunition for his attack on
- Government financing for the arts.
-
- Debora Meltz Newton, N.J.
-
- The Corcoran Gallery of Art did not receive NEA funds for
- the Mapplethorpe exhibition. The NEA provided money directly to
- the Institute of Contemporary Art in Philadelphia, which
- organized a touring Mapplethorpe retrospective.
-
- Debra B. Shriver Director of Public Affairs The
- Corcoran Gallery of Art Washington
-